Skip to content

A closer look at sleep, cells and aging

[Dream Peptides](/)

Sleep and longevity peptides set against their trials. No store.

[Epitalon](/epitalon)
[Telomeres](/telomeres)
[MOTS-c](/mots-c)
[NAD+](/nad)

[Epitalon](/epitalon)
[Telomeres](/telomeres)
[MOTS-c](/mots-c)
[NAD+](/nad)[References](/references)[About](/about)[Contact](/contact)

# Questions about a source or a fact.

A page address, the passage and its supporting source are enough to raise a correction.

## Where to send a correction

Factual corrections can be sent to [editors@dreampeptides.com](mailto:editors@dreampeptides.com). Include the page address, the exact passage and the source that supports the correction. A PubMed record, DOI or full source URL makes the material easier to identify without ambiguity.

A useful note states what is wrong and what the source actually supports. The issue may be the material tested, the species, the study design, the outcome or a safety statement. A precise correction can be short; there is no need to describe a personal health situation.

For example, an epithalamin result attributed to synthetic epitalon would change the material under discussion. A cell-culture result described as a treatment result in people would change the study setting. These are different errors, and naming the distinction helps establish what needs to be checked.

## Details that help identify an error

The page heading and the first few words of the relevant paragraph help locate a passage. If a link leads to the wrong paper, include the link as it appears and the record that seems to be intended. A paper’s year and first author can help distinguish similar publications.

When the disagreement concerns an outcome, identify what the study measured. Blood NAD+ levels, walking distance, melatonin production and telomere length are different measures. A claim may describe one accurately while implying another that was never tested.

The [references page](/references) describes the sources currently discussed on the site. An original study and a review play different roles. A correction based on a review is most useful when it identifies the underlying study or the precise uncertainty the review describes.

## New papers and changed records

A newer paper can change the context of an older result. A correction, retraction or updated agency record can also affect how a finding is described. Include the publication record and the passage that appears relevant, rather than only a headline or a summary from elsewhere.

The date matters especially for regulatory statements. The compound pages identify the date attached to the FDA table they discuss. A later change needs its own source; it cannot be inferred from the absence of a compound in an older table or from a claim that a nomination was withdrawn.

For clinical findings, the material and route remain important even when two papers concern the same broad pathway. An oral precursor study cannot directly correct a statement about an NAD+ infusion unless it actually addresses that different route. The [NAD+ page](/nad) explains why these categories stay separate.

## Medical questions need personal care

Dream Peptides gives no medical advice. This contact address cannot assess symptoms, interpret laboratory results, recommend a compound, select a dose or review a treatment schedule. It cannot determine whether a preparation is suitable for a particular person.

A clinician able to review the individual’s circumstances is the appropriate contact for those decisions. The studies on these pages cannot account for a person’s health history, other medicines or the reason a symptom is occurring. A general account of an experiment cannot replace that assessment.

Personal experiences also cannot establish that a material caused an effect. The [epitalon page](/epitalon) distinguishes anecdotal sleep reports from clinical evidence. A report may be sincerely described while leaving the cause unknown. The corrections address is intended for the accuracy of the published account.

## Keep personal details private

Omit health records, laboratory reports, identity documents and details about another person. A source correction can usually be explained through the public passage and the public record alone. This page does not ask for private medical material or provide a form for submitting it.

The site also cannot confirm the identity, purity or sterility of a substance, evaluate an individual preparation or resolve a transaction. Those questions require evidence beyond a discussion of published studies. There is no product catalog or treatment service here.

For the site’s scope and approach, see [about Dream Peptides](/about). For the evidence behind a specific passage, follow its citation or use the collected source list. Keeping the question tied to a document makes a factual issue easier to assess and keeps the discussion within the purpose of these pages.

Follow the finding to its source.

[Studies and references →](/references)

[Dream Peptides](/)

Dream Peptides is a guide to sleep and longevity studies, with essays to explore rather than medicines to sell, prescriptions to write or people to treat.

[References](/references)[About](/about)[Contact](/contact)

© 2026 Dream Peptides