Questions about a source or a fact.
A page address, the passage and its supporting source are enough to raise a correction.
Where to send a correction
Factual corrections can be sent to editors@dreampeptides.com. Include the page address, the exact passage and the source that supports the correction. A PubMed record, DOI or full source URL makes the material easier to identify without ambiguity.
A useful note states what is wrong and what the source actually supports. The issue may be the material tested, the species, the study design, the outcome or a safety statement. A precise correction can be short; there is no need to describe a personal health situation.
For example, an epithalamin result attributed to synthetic epitalon would change the material under discussion. A cell-culture result described as a treatment result in people would change the study setting. These are different errors, and naming the distinction helps establish what needs to be checked.
Details that help identify an error
The page heading and the first few words of the relevant paragraph help locate a passage. If a link leads to the wrong paper, include the link as it appears and the record that seems to be intended. A paper’s year and first author can help distinguish similar publications.
When the disagreement concerns an outcome, identify what the study measured. Blood NAD+ levels, walking distance, melatonin production and telomere length are different measures. A claim may describe one accurately while implying another that was never tested.
The references page describes the sources currently discussed on the site. An original study and a review play different roles. A correction based on a review is most useful when it identifies the underlying study or the precise uncertainty the review describes.
New papers and changed records
A newer paper can change the context of an older result. A correction, retraction or updated agency record can also affect how a finding is described. Include the publication record and the passage that appears relevant, rather than only a headline or a summary from elsewhere.
The date matters especially for regulatory statements. The compound pages identify the date attached to the FDA table they discuss. A later change needs its own source; it cannot be inferred from the absence of a compound in an older table or from a claim that a nomination was withdrawn.
For clinical findings, the material and route remain important even when two papers concern the same broad pathway. An oral precursor study cannot directly correct a statement about an NAD+ infusion unless it actually addresses that different route. The NAD+ page explains why these categories stay separate.
Medical questions need personal care
Dream Peptides gives no medical advice. This contact address cannot assess symptoms, interpret laboratory results, recommend a compound, select a dose or review a treatment schedule. It cannot determine whether a preparation is suitable for a particular person.
A clinician able to review the individual’s circumstances is the appropriate contact for those decisions. The studies on these pages cannot account for a person’s health history, other medicines or the reason a symptom is occurring. A general account of an experiment cannot replace that assessment.
Personal experiences also cannot establish that a material caused an effect. The epitalon page distinguishes anecdotal sleep reports from clinical evidence. A report may be sincerely described while leaving the cause unknown. The corrections address is intended for the accuracy of the published account.
Keep personal details private
Omit health records, laboratory reports, identity documents and details about another person. A source correction can usually be explained through the public passage and the public record alone. This page does not ask for private medical material or provide a form for submitting it.
The site also cannot confirm the identity, purity or sterility of a substance, evaluate an individual preparation or resolve a transaction. Those questions require evidence beyond a discussion of published studies. There is no product catalog or treatment service here.
For the site’s scope and approach, see about Dream Peptides. For the evidence behind a specific passage, follow its citation or use the collected source list. Keeping the question tied to a document makes a factual issue easier to assess and keeps the discussion within the purpose of these pages.